The service was nominated for best Influencer Campaign in the 10th Annual Streamy Awards. Nebula has grown substantially since starting, with over 140 creators who together have over 120 million collective YouTube subscribers, and reaching over 350,000 subscribers as of August 2021, making it one of the most successful YouTube rival platforms. I wish I knew more about the development of VST’s and Hosts.The idea for Nebula was started and discussed as part of the Standard.TV creator community discussions online and at VidCon, and originally had involvement from CGP Grey and Philipp Dettmer, but they left before Nebula launched on May 23, 2019, with about 75 creators.
Maybe a little less or more depending on which one you use. It is just the latency with the plugin itself is about 1 second or so. I haven’t had any problems with it running slow.
Nebula 3 gpu free#
I dont have the cuda version though, just the free one. I guess its a start! That nebula plugin has some wicked effects that offer extremely nice reverbs. I have an 8800GT gpu and it got it up around 10% with those 5 open and relatively small wave samples. I wasn’t aware about the convolution reverb that jma has pointed out, thanks for that! I tried it out and was able to get about 5 or 6 instances of it running at once before it closed FL Studio completely, without warning. I have seen and read all kinds of ideas in other forums. If so, wouldn’t it then also be possible for vendors to agree on a calling convention defining the current state of the plugin, where to find the input data and controls, and where to put the result(s)? The host will do (the inexepensive) routing between plugins and your CUDA aware plugin will use the GPU for most of its calculations, leaving the CPU free for other uses.Įdit: … Unless you had something slightly different in mind, like say:Ĭould there be a vendor neutral VST-host-like CUDA program that runs a set of arbitrary CUDA-plugins - the one after each other or in parallel - without the need to move data back and forth between CPU and GPU after each plugin completes its run (which would otherwise potentially ruin low-latency performance?) Can one general purpose kernel call another specialized kernel for which there is no source available and only is known in its binary form? … But I was thinking, can there be a small program that “hosts” vst’s… or a program developed with cuda in mind that you can plug your vst’s into? (!) Has anyone heard anything about development of this kind of acceleration? What I CAN imagine is CUDA DRAMATICALLY enhancing the processing of these plugins. I cannot simply imagine CUDA not being able to handle the processing of these plugins! It’s all math! There are actually alot of accelerator cards as well that do this.
Nebula 3 gpu .dll#
dll files associated with the plugins?įor instance - There are plenty of accelerator cards out there, like pro tools, that greatly enhance usability of specific plugins associated with that specific hardware. Do you think there is a way to accelerate the “generator processing” of the. I would like to know if it is possible to accelerate FL Studio or any digital audio program that utilizes VST’s, VSTi’s and DXi’s. Just for a start and general purpose to get things rolling: I pretty much understand its capabilities and cant imagine it not being implemented in the audio workstation (DAW) sector. I am extremely new to any development around CUDA.
0 kommentar(er)
